Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://library.ombudsman.go.ke:8080/jspui/handle/caj/111
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | CAJ | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-24T09:28:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-24T09:28:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Commission on Administrative Justice (CAJ) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://library.ombudsman.go.ke:8080/jspui/handle/caj/111 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Overview: Successive National Development Plans, i.e., National Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (2001); the Economic Recovery Strategy (ERS, 2003-2007); the Kenya Vision 2030 and its Medium-Term Plans; and now the Big-Four (4) National Development Agenda; all emphasize the importance of administrative justice in facilitating effective service delivery and good governance in the public sector. Key international policy and strategic blue-prints such as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) covering the period 2000-2015 and its successor, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) covering the period 2016-2030; the Africa Union (AU)’s Agenda 2063; and the East Africa Community (EAC)’s Vision 2050; equally recognise that administrative justice is imperative for both economic growth and development that then defines international development cooperation. The Commission previously had a Strategic Plan covering the period 2013 – 2016, whose term came to a close. Based on fundamental changes and emerging issues in the operating environment, plus shifts in macro-level planning cycle; it was necessary to review the implementation status of the preceding CAJ Strategic Plan and utilise the same to inform the development of a new Strategic Plan covering the period 2019-2023. This Strategic Plan has been prepared through a participatory process involving the CAJ Commissioners; Management; and Staff, while recognising and putting in place initiatives that will effectively respond to the needs and expectations of its diverse stakeholder segments. Lessons Learnt: Several key lessons have been learnt which informed development and implementation of strategies and activities during the period of this Strategic Plan. These key lessons are: (i) Staffing level- Need to attract and retain competent technical staff to facilitate effective delivery of the Commission’s mandate; (ii) Resource Mobilization- Need to develop and implement a comprehensive resource mobilization strategy; (iii) Target Setting- Need to set clear performance targets to facilitate effective performance management and monitoring, evaluation and reporting on the implementation status of the Strategic Plan; (iv) Accountability Centers - Responsibility needs to be assigned to specific functions to enhance accountability for performance and eliminate duplicity of effort; and (v) Stakeholder Engagement and Visibility- Need for enhanced stakeholder engagement and visibility of the Commission to enhance the corporate image. Emerging Issues: The key emerging issues in the operational environment that the Commission needs to respond to moving forward include: (i) Enactment of the Access to Information Act, 2016; (ii) Emergence of multi-agency team to fight corruption; (iii) Establishment of the County Regional Economic Blocs; (iv) The impetus to enforce rule of law by the DPP and the DCI offices; (v) Need for benchmarking with global-best practices in administrative justice; and (vi) Use of alternative dispute resolution methods and systems in resolution of complaints. Key Success Factors: The imperatives which the Commission must do right moving into the future in order to fulfil its mandate and justify its existence include: (i) Capacity building; (ii) Alignment of organizational culture to strategic direction; (iii) Automation of processes and process re-engineering; (iv) Visibility and branding; (v) Advocacy; (vi) Effective performance management; (vii) Effective resource mobilization and prudent utilization; (viii) Amendment of the legal framework; (ix) Effective change management; and (x) Effective decentralization of services. | en_US |
dc.subject | core functions | en_US |
dc.subject | milestones | en_US |
dc.subject | complaints resolution activities | en_US |
dc.subject | governance and best practice activities | en_US |
dc.subject | capacity strengthening activities | en_US |
dc.subject | positioning and branding related activities | en_US |
dc.subject | challenges faced | en_US |
dc.subject | key result areas | en_US |
dc.subject | rationale for developing the strategic plan | en_US |
dc.subject | alignment to relevant legal and policy documents | en_US |
dc.subject | situation analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | strategic model | en_US |
dc.subject | cordination framework and implementation of the strategic plan | en_US |
dc.subject | financial resources | en_US |
dc.subject | monitoring evaluation and reporting | en_US |
dc.subject | implementation matrix | en_US |
dc.title | Commission on Administrative Justice strategic plan 2019 - 2023 | en_US |
dc.type | Book | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Strategic Reports |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CAJ Strategic Plan 2019-2023.pdf | 5.45 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.